June 23, 2020

1583 words 8 mins read

The Last Smash and Grab at the Federal Communications Commission

The Last Smash and Grab at the Federal Communications Commission

ATT and Verizon secured arguably one of the biggest regulatory benefits from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with the agency ending the last remnants of telecom competition law. In return for this massive gift from the federal government, they will give the public absolutely nothing.  A Little Bit of Telecom History  When the Department of Justice successfully broke up the ATT monopoly

into regional companies, it needed Congress to pass a law to open up the regional companies (known as Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers or ILECs) to competition. To do that, the Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that established bedrock competition law and reaffirmed non-discrimination policies that net neutrality is based on.  The law Congress created a new industry that would interoperate with the ILECs. These companies were called Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) and already existed locally at the time as many were selling early day Internet access via dialup over the ATT telephone lines along with local phone services. As broadband came to market, CLECs used the copper wires of ILECs to sell competitive DSL services. In the early years the policy worked and competition sprung forth with 1,000s of new companies existing along with a massive new competition based investment in the telecom sector in general (see chart below).

Source: Data assembled by the California Public Utilities Commission in 2005 Congress intervened to create the competitive market through the FCC, but at the same time gave the FCC the keys (through a process called “forbearance”) to eliminate the regulatory interventions should competition take root on its own. The FCC started to apply forbearance just a short number of years after the passage of the ‘96 Act with arguably one of the most significant decisions in 2005 when fiber wires being deployed by ILECs did not have to be shared with CLECs like copper wires with the entry of Verizon FiOS. Many states followed course though with notable resistance because it was questionable whether future networks did not need strong competition policy to ensure the goals of affordability and universality could be met with market forces alone. One California Public Utilities Commissioner expressed concern that “within a few years there may not be any ZIP codes left in California with more than five or six providers.” What Little Competition Remains Today The ILECs today, essentially ATT and Verizon, no longer deploy fiber broadband and have abandoned competition with cable companies to pursue wireless services. Without access to fiber, CLECs began to deploy their own fiber networks that were financed from their revenues they gained from copper DSL customers, even in rural markets. But for the last two years ATT and Verizon have been trying to put a stop to that by asking the FCC to use its forbearance power to eliminate copper sharing as well, which they achieved today. Worst yet, ATT is already positioning itself to abandon DSL copper lines rather than upgrade them to fiber in markets across the country leaving people with a cable monopoly or undependable cell phone service for Internet. In other words, the FCC will effectively make the digital divide worse for 100,000s of Americans by today’s decision.  Broadband competition has been on a long slow decline for well over a decade after the FCC’s 2005 decision. In the years that followed the industry rapidly consolidated with smaller companies being snuffed out or closing shop. Virtually every single prediction the FCC made about the market in 2005 have failed to pan out and the end result is a huge number of Americans now face regional monopolies as their need for high-speed access has grown dramatically during the pandemic. It is time to rethink the approach, but today we got a double down.  The FCC’s Decision is Not Final and a Future FCC Can Chart a New Course The decline of competition didn’t happen exclusively at the hands of the current FCC, but the signs of the regional monopolization were obvious at the start of 2017 when the agency decided to abandon its authority over the industry and repeal net neutrality rules. Approving today’s ATT/Verizon petition to end the 1996’s final remnants of competition policy, rather than improving and modernizing them to promote high-speed access competition, the FCC has decided that big ISPs know best. But we see what is going to happen next. ATT will work hard to eliminate any small competitors on their copper lines because doing so impairs their ability to replace them with fiber. All that while they themselves will not provide the fiber replacement resulting in a worsening of the digital divide worse across the country. The right policy would make sure every American gets a fiber line rather than disconnected. None of this has to happen though and EFF will work hard in the states and in DC to bring back competition in broadband access.

Author: Ernesto Falcon

Date: 2020-10-27

URL: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/last-smash-and-grab-federal-communications-commission


Antitrust Suit Against Google is a Watershed Moment (2020-10-29) The antitrust lawsuit against Google filed by the Department of Justice DOJ and eleven state attorneys general has the potential to be the most important competition case against a technology company since the DOJs 1998 suit against Microsoft The complaint is broad covering Googles power over search generally along with search advertising Instead of asking for money damages the complaint asks for ..
Find Out How Ad Trackers Follow You On the Web With EFF’s “Cover Your Tracks” Tool (2020-11-19) Beginner-Friendly Tool Gives Users Options for Avoiding Browser Fingerprinting and TrackingSan FranciscoThe Electronic Frontier Foundation EFF today launched Cover Your Tracks a interactive tool that teaches users how advertisers follow them as they shop or browse online and how to fight back against corporate trackers to protect their privacy mitigate relentless ad targeting and improve the web e..
Action for Egyptian Human Rights Defenders (2020-12-02) The undersigned organisations strongly condemn the persecution of employees of the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights EIPR and Egyptian civil society by the Egyptian government We urge the global community and their respective governments to do the same and join us in calling for the release of detained human rights defenders and a stop to the demonisation of civil society organisations and h..
ICANN Can Stand Against Censorship (And Avoid Another .ORG Debacle) by Keeping Content Regulation and Other Dangerous Policies Out of Its Registry Contracts (2020-11-22) The Internets domain name system is not the place to police speech ICANN the organization that regulates that system is legally bound not to act as the Internets speech police but its legal commitments are riddled with exceptions and aspiring censors have already used those exceptions in harmful ways This was one factor that made the failed takeover of the ORG registry such a dangerous situation B..
Bar Applicants Deserve Better than a Remotely Proctored “Barpocalypse” (2020-10-09) This week was the California Bar Exam a grueling two-day test that determines whether or not a person can practice law in California Despite the privacy and security risks remote proctoring apps present to users the California Bar as well as several other state bars throughout the country are requiring that students use proctoring and surveillance app ExamSoft to protect the integrity of the test ..
Members of Congress Join the Fight for Protest Surveillance Transparency (2020-10-20) Three members of Congress have joined the fight for the right to protest by sending a letter to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board PCLOB to investigate federal surveillance against protesters We commend these elected officials for doing what they can to help ensure our constitutional right to protest and for taking the interests and safety of protesters to heart It often takes years i..
macOS Leaks Application Usage, Forces Apple to Make Hard Decisions (2020-11-18) Last week users of macOS noticed that attempting to open non-Apple applications while connected to the Internet resulted in long delays if the applications opened at all The interruptions were caused by a macOS security service attempting to reach Apples Online Certificate Status Protocol OCSP server which had become unreachable due to internal errors When security researchers looked into the cont..
Facebook’s Most Recent Transparency Report Demonstrates the Pitfalls of Automated Content Moderation (2020-10-08) In the wake of the coronavirus pandemic many social media platforms shifted their content moderation policies to rely much more heavily on automated tools Twitter Facebook and YouTube all ramped up their machine learning capabilities to review and identify flagged content in efforts to ensure the wellbeing of their content moderation teams and the privacy of their users Most social media companies..
The Selective Prosecution of Julian Assange (2020-10-07) As the extradition hearing for Wikileaks Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange unfolds it is increasingly clear that the prosecution of Assange fits into a pattern of governments selectively enforcing laws in order to punish those who provoke their ire As we see in Assanges case and in many others before this computer crime laws are especially ripe for this form of politicization The key evidence in the ..
EFF to Supreme Court: American Companies Complicit in Human Rights Abuses Abroad Should Be Held Accountable (2020-10-21) For years EFF has been calling for US companies that act as repressions little helpers to be held accountable and now were telling the US Supreme Court Despite all the ways that technology has been used as a force for goodconnecting people around the world giving voice to the less powerful and facilitating knowledge sharingtechnology has also been used as a force multiplier for repression and huma..