June 19, 2020

1683 words 8 mins read

California Is Putting Together A Broadband Plan We Have Thoughts

California Is Putting Together A Broadband Plan We Have Thoughts

Right now the California Public Utilities Commission and the California Broadband Council are collecting public comments to create the California Broadband Plan, per Governor Newsom’s Executive Order 73-20. The order’s purpose is to find a way to deliver 100 mbps-capable Internet connections to around 2 million Californians who lack access to at least one high-speed connection. These Californians

overwhelmingly live in two types of places: rural and low-income urban.  California’s Systemic Broadband Access Failures Will Require a Lot of Work to Fix, But It Can Be Done California has some major broadband access problems, despite the size and reach of its economy. The state has the largest number of students (1.298 million) in the country who are unable to access high-speed Internet access. When we see kids going to fast food parking lots for Internet access, like the two little girls in Salinas, California doing their homework with Taco Bell parking lot WiFi, that is a pretty clear sign of policy failure in cities. When 2 million, mostly rural, Californian residents are dependent on the now bankrupt Frontier Communications— which received billions in federal subsidies and spent a lot of it on obsolete copper DSL instead of profitable fiber to the home—that is a pretty clear sign of both policy failure and market failure. And when studies of California cities find that ISPs are more likely to avoid Black neighborhoods with fiber in Los Angeles and have deployment patterns of high-speed access that mirror 1930s-era redlining in Oakland, we have a failure to modernize and enforce our existing non-discrimination laws.  As bad as things are today, particularly in light of how the pandemic has shifted more of our needs online, the state has a great opportunity to fix these problems. EFF has been studying this issue and based on our legal and technical research, we’ve submitted recommendations to the state outlining how to bring fiber-to-the-home to all people.  Here is the good news. It is already commercially feasible to deliver fiber to the home to 90% of households in the United States (and California) within a handful of years—if we adopt the right policies soon. Public sector deployments led by rural cooperatives across the country are proving that even in the cases of the absolutely hardest deployments, such as a 7,500 person cooperative reaching only 2.5 people per square mile, it’s possible to get access to gigabit fiber-to-the-home. So, contrary to what a legacy industry overly reliant on limiting customers to yesterday’s infrastructure may say, or the arguments of policy makers who adopt the belief that some residents deserve 2nd-class access to the Internet, it can not only be done, it should already be happening now.  EFF’s Recommendations to the State of California to Deliver a Fiber for All Future If our current and past policies have failed us, what is the new approach? You can read our is our full filing here (pdf), but our main points are as follows:

Prioritize local private and public options and de-emphasize reliance on large national ISPs tethered to 3 to 5 years return on investment formulas. This short-term focus is incompatible with resolving the digital divide that will require 10 year or longer return on investment strategies (that’s ok with fiber that will last several decades). Mandate full fiber deployment in California cities with a density of more than 1,000 people per square mile in areas where low-income neighborhoods are being denied fiber infrastructure, in violation of current law. Give Internet service providers (ISPs) an opportunity to remedy, but make the consequence of failing to do so losing both their franchise for lack of compliance and the right to do business in California. Promote open access fiber policies and sharing opportunities in fiber infrastructure to reduce the overall cost of deployment. Leverage existing fiber needs in non-telecom markets such as electrical utilities to jointly work with telecom providers.  Adopt statewide San Francisco’s tenants ordinance, which expanded broadband competition through the city’s apartment complexes and ended the monopoly arrangement between cable companies and landlords.  Have the state assist in the creation of special districts to fill the role of rural cooperatives when a rural cooperative does not exist. Provide support in feasibility studies, technical education support, long term financing, and regulatory support to ensure such networks can interconnect with the nearest fiber infrastructure.  Begin mapping public sector fiber infrastructure, and open it up to shared uses to facilitate more local public and private options. Require private ISPs to provide mapping data of their fiber deployments to facilitate sharing, and intervene to address monopoly withholding of fiber access if necessary.   Standardize and expedite the permitting process for deploying fiber. Explore ways to improve micro-trenching policy to make it easier to deploy fiber in cities.  Support local government efforts to build fiber by financially supporting their ability to access the bond market and obtain long term low interest debt financing.

We hope that state policymakers recognize the importance of fiber optics as the core ingredient for 21st-century networks. It is already a universally adopted medium to deliver high-capacity networks, with more than 1 billion gigabit fiber connections coming online in a few years (primarily led by China). And to the extent that policymakers wish to see 5G high-speed wireless in all places, the industry has made it clear that is contingent on dense fiber networks being everywhere first.  We urge the state to start the work needed to bring broadband access to every Californian as soon as possible. It will be hard work, but we can do it—if we start with the right policies, right now.

Author: Ernesto Falcon

Date: 2020-10-16

URL: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/california-putting-together-broadband-plan-we-have-thoughts

eff.org

Open Education and Artificial Scarcity in Hard Times (2020-10-22) The sudden move to remote education by universities this year has forced the inevitable: the move to an online education While most universities wont be fully remote having course materials online was already becoming the norm before the COVID-19 pandemic and this year it has become mandatory for millions of educators and students As academia recovers from this crisis and hopefully prepares for th..
EFF Publishes New Research on Real-Time Crime Centers in the U.S. (2020-11-16) EFF has published a new report Surveillance Compounded: Real-Time Crime Centers in the United States which profiles seven surveillance hubs operated by local law enforcement plus data on dozens of others scattered across the country Researched and written in collaboration with students at the Reynolds School of Journalism at the University of Nevada Reno the report focuses on the growth of real-ti..
Visa Wants to Buy Plaid, and With It, Transaction Data for Millions of People (2020-11-25) Visa the credit card network is trying to buy financial technology company Plaid for $53 billion The merger is bad for a number of reasons First and foremost it would allow a giant company with a controlling market share and a history ofanticompetitive practices to snap up its fast-growing competition in the market for payment apps But Plaid is more than a potential disruptor its also sitting on a..
Elections Are Partisan Affairs. Election Security Isn’t. (2020-11-16) An Open Letter on Election Security Voting is the cornerstone of our democracy And since computers are deeply involved in all segments of voting at this point computer security is vital to the protection of this fundamental right Everyone needs to be able to trust that the critical infrastructure systems we rely upon to safeguard our votes are defended that problems are transparently identified as..
Introducing Cover Your Tracks! (2020-11-19) Today were pleased to announce Cover Your Tracks the newest edition and rebranding of our historic browser fingerprinting and tracker awareness tool Panopticlick Cover Your Tracks picks up where Panopticlick left off Panopticlick was about letting users know that browser fingerprinting was possible; Cover Your Tracks is about giving users the tools to fight back against the trackers and improve th..
EU Parliament Paves the Way for an Ambitious Internet Bill (2020-10-21) The European Union has made the first step towards a significant overhaul of its core platform regulation the e-Commerce Directive In order to inspire the European Commission which is currently preparing a proposal for a Digital Services Act Package the EU Parliament has voted on three related Reports IMCO JURI and LIBE reports which address the legal responsibilities of platforms regarding user c..
EFF Files Comment Opposing the Department of Homeland Security’s Massive Expansion of Biometric Surveillance (2020-10-22) EFF joined by several leading civil liberties and immigrant rights organizations recently filed a comment calling on the Department of Homeland Security DHS to withdraw a proposed rule that would exponentially expand biometrics collection from both US citizens and noncitizens who apply for immigration benefits and would allow DHS to mandate the collection of face data iris scans palm prints voice ..
Victory! Court Protects Anonymity of Security Researchers Who Reported Apparent Communications Between Russian Bank and Trump Organization (2020-11-24) Security researchers who reported observing Internet communications between the Russian financial firm Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization in 2016 can remain anonymous an Indiana trial court ruled last week The ruling protects the First Amendment anonymous speech rights of the researchers whose analysis prompted significant media attention and debate in 2016 about the meaning of digital records t..
Computer Security Experts Urge White House to Keep Politics Out of Election Security (2020-11-17) Elections Are Partisan Affairs - Election Security IsntSan Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation EFF has joined more than three dozen cybersecurity experts and professional security organizations in calling for the White House to keep politics out of securing this months election Election security officials and computer security experts must be able to tell the truth about the security of..
Congress Fails to Ask Tech CEOs the Hard Questions (2020-10-29) The Big Internet Companies Are Too Powerful But Undermining Section 230 Wont Help The Senate Commerce Committee met this week to question the heads of Facebook Twitter and Google about Section 230 the most important law protecting free speech online Section 230 reflects the common-sense principle that legal liability for unlawful online speech should rest with the speaker not the Internet services..